Analysis of a Ford recall shows that too many people are ignoring vehicle recall notices. Experts say the cost of gas and waiting for it to be fixed may not be worth it for what someone considers a silly, non-threatening repair. Take, for example, the Ford recall mentioned earlier. The problem with these vehicles was that the cruise-control switch could overheat, and so far only half of the estimated 10 million have been repaired. Though an overheating switch might not sound like a big deal, while the switch remains connected it can cause a fire at any time, even if the vehicle is turned off. To give you an idea of the kind of damage this could cause, a spokesperson for Ford reminds owners that if their car is in their garage when the engine catches fire, it could burn down their entire house.
          This is just one instance of how ignoring a recall notice for your vehicle can put you and your family at risk. The example of the cruise-control switch shows that even a seemingly insignificant defect can turn into a nightmare if it is not properly taken care of. Though the wait at the dealership and the cost of gas may seem too inconvenient on the surface, a recall repair should not be put ahead of your personal safety.

In January, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed new regulations for roof strength to prevent roof crush during a car wreck. It is estimated that at least 75 percent of vehicles on the road will not pass the proposed NHTSA standards.

Feedback for the proposal is expected in the middle of March.

The NHTSA roof crush standards have not been updated since 1978. Over 35 years, a demand for stronger restrictions has grown. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is planning to release a report on roof crush safety. The IIHS is also planning on instituting a roof crush test to the already established front and side crash tests.

The current NHTSA roof crush standards require that a vehicle that weighs 6,000 pounds or less needs to withstand a force of 1.5 times the vehicle’s weight. This means that if a vehicle rolls over, the roof should only crush in a maximum of five inches.

Any vehicle that is heavier than 6,000 pounds, like pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, are exempt from the standards. This is despite the fact that trucks and sport utility vehicles are at a higher risk of roll over, causing severe roof crush.

The proposed NHTSA standard raises the weight standard of 1.5 to 2.5, although a ratio of 3.5 times the weight of the vehicle is preferred.

The NHTSA is also considering a new roof crush test. Currently, weight is applied to only one side of the roof. The NHTSA is looking into creating a test to apply weight to both sides of a vehicle’s roof, in order to better simulate roof crush during a car wreck.

Many believe that creating a test in which a vehicle actually rolls would provide the most accurate information, but the NHTSA is only considering an adaptation of their current test, which lowers a metal plate onto the roof of a car.

Certain types of cars are left out of NHTSA’s proposal, such as convertibles, low roof line vehicles and cars designed with an open body like the Jeep Wrangler.

If you or a loved on has been seriously or fatally injured by roof crush during a car wreck, contact a roof crush attorney at Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP at 1-800-460-0606. An experienced roof crush lawyer will be able to evaluate if you are eligible to seek compensation.

Two product liability cases filed in Marshall, Texas allege that General Motors used faulty seatbelts in vehicles. Both cases were filed the last week of February, 2008.

One case alleges that General Motors was negligent in regards to the design and manufacturing of the 2004 Cadillac DeVille. A woman sustained serious injuries during a car wreck when her seat belt failed to protect her.

The lawsuit claims that the seat belt was defective and violated the established federal standards for seat belt crashworthiness.

The second suit was filed regarding the crashworthiness of a 1993 Chevrolet Lumina. The suit alleges that a women sustained fatal injuries during a car wreck due to a faulty seat belt. The suit accuses General Motors of violating the federal standards of crashworthiness.

If your or a loved on have been seriously or fatally injured during a car wreck due to safety belt defects, contact a seat belt attorney at Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP at 1-800-460-0606. An experienced seat belt lawyer will be able to evaluate if you are eligible to seek compensation.